[legalentitymanagement] Code generation: update services and models #1602
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @AdyenAutomationBot, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request delivers automated updates to the Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces automated updates to the legalentitymanagement service, primarily adding a new requestPeriodicReview method and updating some model definitions. The changes are straightforward. I've left one suggestion on the new method to improve the generated code's readability and simplicity.
| */ | ||
| public async requestPeriodicReview(id: string, requestOptions?: IRequest.Options): Promise<void> { | ||
| const endpoint = `${this.baseUrl}/legalEntities/{id}/requestPeriodicReview` | ||
| .replace("{" + "id" + "}", encodeURIComponent(String(id))); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This line can be simplified for better readability. The string concatenation for the path parameter placeholder is unnecessary and can be a direct string literal. Additionally, String(id) is redundant since id is already a string. These appear to be artifacts from the code generator that could be improved.
| .replace("{" + "id" + "}", encodeURIComponent(String(id))); | |
| .replace("{id}", encodeURIComponent(id)); |
AdyenAutomationBot
force-pushed
the
sdk-automation/legalentitymanagement
branch
from
cdb9d72 to
df1fa67
Compare
AdyenAutomationBot
force-pushed
the
sdk-automation/legalentitymanagement
branch
from
df1fa67 to
1d35682
Compare
This PR contains the automated changes for the
legalentitymanagementservice.The commit history of this PR reflects the
adyen-openapicommits that have been applied.